Difference between revisions of "TRC Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Cards"
m (number sections) |
m (Already had a Scoring section) |
||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
Was the critique clear and concise? Were gimmicks explained well? | Was the critique clear and concise? Were gimmicks explained well? | ||
=== 13. | === 13. Awards === | ||
Were scoring and awards presentation efficient? | Were scoring and awards presentation efficient? | ||
== Thank you for your opinion == | == Thank you for your opinion == | ||
Please print any additional comments on the back, such as what you liked most or least about this event. | Please print any additional comments on the back, such as what you liked most or least about this event. | ||
Revision as of 12:23, 26 November 2007
Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Card
Rallye Name: ___________________________________________________
Class: __________ Car #: _________ Date: _________________
(circle one) Driver Navigator Passenger
Optional: Your name: ______________________________
Where did you hear about this rallye? ________________________________________
This gimmick rallye is contending for the annual Best TRC Rallye Award. Please help TRC present better rallyes by filling out the following evaluation card.
Please rate this rallye in each of the below categories on a scale of 0 to 10. 0 is awful, 5 is average, 10 is excellent.
1. Overall Impression
Was the rallye enjoyable and challenging?
2. At the Start
Was registration efficient?
If you attended the Beginner's Introduction (also known as a Rallye School), was it a good use of your time?
3. Instructions
Were the instructions clear, concise, and accurate? Was there enough info? Were gimmicks explained well in the critique?
4. Checkpoint Materials & Personnel
Was any checkpoint material clear and legible? Were workers polite, well instructed, and competent?
5. Route
Were the roads safe and in good condition? Was the route free of traffic problems?
6. Rallye-erected Signs
If used, were coursemarkers or other rallye signs visible, readable, and well placed?
7. Other Signs
Were other signs used by the rallye visible & readable?
8. Creativity
Was the rallye interesting? Did it work well with its theme? Were there new, innovative ideas?
9. Execution
Did gimmicks work well? Was there a good balance of easy and difficult gimmicks? Was the rallye well thought out and "polished"?
10. Scoring & Fairness
Was the scoring fair and accurate? Were the gimmicks weighted correctly? Were protests handled fairly?
11. Length
Was the rallye about the right length in time? If not, would you prefer ______ shorter or ________ longer
Was the rallye the right length in distance? If not, would you prefer ______ shorter or ________ longer
12. Critique
Was the critique clear and concise? Were gimmicks explained well?
13. Awards
Were scoring and awards presentation efficient?
Thank you for your opinion
Please print any additional comments on the back, such as what you liked most or least about this event.