Difference between revisions of "TRC Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Cards"

From TRCWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(I did most of what we were thinking about. More sections, more than one Q in some sections.)
m (www.therallyeclub.org -> old.therallyeclub.org)
 
(50 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[http://www.therallyeclub.org/w/index.php?title=TRC_Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Cards&oldid=236 Original Version for Reference]
[[Image:TRCLogo.gif]]
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
* [http://old.therallyeclub.org/w/index.php?title=TRC_Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Cards&oldid=236 Original Version, 10 questions, 10 points each (for reference)]
* [http://old.therallyeclub.org/w/index.php?title=TRC_Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Cards&oldid=279#Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Card:_Rate_1-10 2007 Version, 15 questions, 10 points each (for reference)]
* [http://old.therallyeclub.org/w/index.php?title=TRC_Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Cards&oldid=332#TRC_Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Card 2008 Version, 20 questions, 5 points each, agree/disagree format (for reference)]
* [http://old.therallyeclub.org/w/index.php?title=TRC_Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Cards&oldid=2608#TRC_Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Card 2013 Version using new open-ended format]
* [http://old.therallyeclub.org/w/index.php?title=TRC_Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Cards&oldid=2617#TRC_Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Card 2014 Version using new open-ended format]
* [[#TRC_Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Card|Current Draft using new open-ended format]]
* [[Talk:TRC Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Cards|Discussion about this document]]


== Variety Rallye Evaluation Card ==
----
 
 
Please print additional comments on the back such as what you liked most or least about this event.  Thank you for your opinion.
 
Rallye Name:  ___________________________________________________
 
Class: __________ Car #: _________  Date: _________________
 
(circle one) Driver  Navigator  Passenger
 
Optional:  Your name: ______________________________
 
Where did you hear about this rallye?  ________________________________________
 
This Variety (gimmick) rallye is contending for the annual Best TRC Rallye Award.  Please help TRC present better rallyes by filling out the following evaluation card.
 
Please rate this rallye in each of the below categories on a scale of '''0 to 10'''.  '''0''' is awful, '''5''' is '''average''', '''10''' is excellent.
 
=== Overall Impression ===
Was the rallye enjoyable and challenging?
 
=== At the Start ===
Was registration efficient?


If you attended the Beginner's Introduction (also known as a Rallye School), was it a good use of your time?
==TRC Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Card==
Rallye Name  _________________________  Date ___________


=== Instructions ===
Class ___________ Circle one: Driver  Navigator  Passenger
Were the instructions clear, concise, and accurate? Was there enough info? Were gimmicks explained well in the critique?


=== Checkpoint Materials & Personnel ===
Optional: Name _____________________________ Car # ____
Was any checkpoint material clear and legible? Were workers polite, well instructed, and competent?


=== Route ===
How did you hear about this rallye?  ____________________
Were the roads safe and in good condition?  Was the route free of traffic problems?


=== Rallye-erected Signs ===
What convinced you to try it? ___________________________
If used, were coursemarkers or other rallye signs visible, readable, and well placed?


=== Other Signs ===
Will you try another rallye? _____________________________
Were other signs used by the rallye visible & readable?


=== Creativity ===
What might get you to rallye more?  _____________________
Was the rallye interesting?  Did it work well with its theme?  Were there new, innovative ideas?


=== Execution ===
What was your '''favorite''' gimmick?  _______________________
Did gimmicks work well?  Was there a good balance of easy and difficult gimmicks?  Was the rallye well thought out and "polished"?


=== Scoring & Fairness ===
What was your '''least favorite''' gimmick?  __________________
Was the scoring fair and accurate?  Were the gimmicks weighted correctly?  Were protests handled fairly?


=== Length ===
Was the rallye about the right length in time?  If not, would you prefer ______ shorter  or ________ longer


Was the rallye the right length in distance?   If not, would you prefer ______ shorter  or ________ longer
The length (distance) was: ___ too long    ___ about right    ___ too short<br>
The duration (time) was: ___ too long    ___ about right    ___ too short<br>
The difficulty was: ___ too hard    ___ about right   ___ too easy<br>
Overall, it was: ___ great fun  ___ fun  ___ OK  ___ a waste of time<br>


=== Critique ===
Was the critique clear and concise?  Were gimmicks explained well?


=== Scoring ===
Please provide any comments you have about:
Were scoring and awards presentation efficient?


* planning/organization:  ____________________________________________


* registration:  ______________________________________________________


== Discussion ==
* clarity/formatting of instructions:  _________________________________


I don't want to "mess up" the draft above, but am thinking we could separate (into separate sections)
* unintended errors: ________________________________________________
* scoring, and awards presentation efficient? (moved close to end)
* material clear and legible?
  * registration and CP workers competent?
- [[User:Dean|Dean]]


----
* checkpoint location(s):  ____________________________________________


I guess we're putting discussion here rather than in the talk page.
* checkpoint process:  _______________________________________________


Anyway, the rallyemaster doesn't have much control over registration, so we shouldn't count that as part of the "best rallye" awards (although it may still be useful feedback).
* rallyemaster(s) & worker(s):  ________________________________________
It would be good to ask about the beginners school too, although we shouldn't expect upper division rallyists to answer that question.
And we shouldn't count it when someone other than the rallyemaster gives the class.


I like the idea of putting the questions in rough chronological order (i.e., moving scoring and awards presentation towards the end).
* roads used:  _______________________________________________________


And as we mentioned last night, very few people can offer meaningful feedback on whether protests were handled fairly.
* signs used:  _______________________________________________________
Perhaps a better indicator would be how often the protest committee overrules the rallyemaster.


[[User:Darin|Darin McGrew]] 10:51, 14 November 2007 (PST)
* understanding any gimmicks you missed after reading the critique:  


----
:__________________________________________________________________


I did many of the tasks that we had been talking about. See what you think.
* the way gimmicks were scored/weighted: __________________________


I also propose that each question get scored by those who answer that question, so partial evaluations are used.
* scoring/awards process:  __________________________________________


- [[User:Dean|Dean]]
Thank you. Please feel free to print any additional comments on the back.

Latest revision as of 19:00, 25 August 2015

TRC Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Card

Rallye Name _________________________ Date ___________

Class ___________ Circle one: Driver Navigator Passenger

Optional: Name _____________________________ Car # ____

How did you hear about this rallye? ____________________

What convinced you to try it? ___________________________

Will you try another rallye? _____________________________

What might get you to rallye more? _____________________

What was your favorite gimmick? _______________________

What was your least favorite gimmick? __________________


The length (distance) was: ___ too long ___ about right ___ too short
The duration (time) was: ___ too long ___ about right ___ too short
The difficulty was: ___ too hard ___ about right ___ too easy
Overall, it was: ___ great fun ___ fun ___ OK ___ a waste of time


Please provide any comments you have about:

  • planning/organization: ____________________________________________
  • registration: ______________________________________________________
  • clarity/formatting of instructions: _________________________________
  • unintended errors: ________________________________________________
  • checkpoint location(s): ____________________________________________
  • checkpoint process: _______________________________________________
  • rallyemaster(s) & worker(s): ________________________________________
  • roads used: _______________________________________________________
  • signs used: _______________________________________________________
  • understanding any gimmicks you missed after reading the critique:
__________________________________________________________________
  • the way gimmicks were scored/weighted: __________________________
  • scoring/awards process: __________________________________________

Thank you. Please feel free to print any additional comments on the back.

Retrieved from "http://wiki.therallyeclub.org/w/index.php?title=TRC_Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Cards&oldid=2663"