Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gimmick Rallye Class Structure"

From TRCWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Talk:Rallye Class Structure moved to Talk:Gimmick Rallye Class Structure: Embarrassing oversight from a guy who actually runs timed rallyes.)
m (added award info to article)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Should we make it clear that this is the experience class structure for '''gimmick''' rallyes (since timed rallyes use a completely different system)?
Also, should the title be in lower case (the way it might appear in the middle of a sentence), or should the words be capitalized (or cap/lc if we add little words like "the" or "a" to the title)?
[[User:Darin|Darin McGrew]] 09:50, 24 July 2007 (PDT)
We should take the proposals from the Operating Procedures (which I don't have handy) and assure they're applied here.  I'm thinking of the requirement that one win first place awards to move up and clarifying that the count starts over with each class.
We should take the proposals from the Operating Procedures (which I don't have handy) and assure they're applied here.  I'm thinking of the requirement that one win first place awards to move up and clarifying that the count starts over with each class.


Line 27: Line 21:
--[[User:Dean|Dean]] 17:53, 24 July 2007 (PDT)
--[[User:Dean|Dean]] 17:53, 24 July 2007 (PDT)


That looks right to me, at least for the basic awards.
Yeah, I think adding the prize counts (I think you're correct, but Teresa would know for certain.  I don't think she's anywhere near finding talk pages yet) would be a good idea.


Do we want to mention the Top Score award (to a team with at least one TRC member) or the Skunk award (for any team with a perfect score)?
Probably also a mention of the skunk and mugs.  I just typed this one up because of the discussion at the meeting, so I hope it's in line with the ops procedures.
<br>--[[User:Steve|Steve]] 21:39, 25 July 2007 (PDT)


What about the pair of mugs we give to the top score in the lowest class that isn't empty?
I just added the awards table. I also mentioned the Top Score award, the Skunk award, and the mugs.


[[User:Darin|Darin McGrew]] 17:59, 24 July 2007 (PDT)
[[User:Darin|Darin McGrew]] 00:50, 26 July 2007 (PDT)

Latest revision as of 01:50, 26 July 2007

We should take the proposals from the Operating Procedures (which I don't have handy) and assure they're applied here. I'm thinking of the requirement that one win first place awards to move up and clarifying that the count starts over with each class.

I'd also like a table showing how many awards are typically issued in each class, something like below. (I fixed this one.) In any case, is this info right?

Class Prizes typically awarded
First Timer First, Second, Third
Beginner First, Second, Third
Novice First, Second, Third
Senior First, Second
Expert First, Second
Master Expert First

--Dean 17:53, 24 July 2007 (PDT)

Yeah, I think adding the prize counts (I think you're correct, but Teresa would know for certain. I don't think she's anywhere near finding talk pages yet) would be a good idea.

Probably also a mention of the skunk and mugs. I just typed this one up because of the discussion at the meeting, so I hope it's in line with the ops procedures.
--Steve 21:39, 25 July 2007 (PDT)

I just added the awards table. I also mentioned the Top Score award, the Skunk award, and the mugs.

Darin McGrew 00:50, 26 July 2007 (PDT)