TRC Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Cards

Original Version for Reference

Variety Rallye Evaluation Card

Rallye Name: ___________________________________________________

Class: __________ Car #: _________ Date: _________________

(circle one) Driver Navigator Passenger

Optional: Your name: ______________________________

Where did you hear about this rallye? ________________________________________

This Variety (gimmick) rallye is contending for the annual Best TRC Rallye Award. Please help TRC present better rallyes by filling out the following evaluation card.

Please rate this rallye in each of the below categories on a scale of 0 to 10. 0 is awful, 5 is average, 10 is excellent.

Overall Impression

Was the rallye enjoyable and challenging?

At the Start

Was registration efficient?

If you attended the Beginner's Introduction (also known as a Rallye School), was it a good use of your time?

Instructions

Were the instructions clear, concise, and accurate? Was there enough info? Were gimmicks explained well in the critique?

Checkpoint Materials & Personnel

Was any checkpoint material clear and legible? Were workers polite, well instructed, and competent?

Route

Were the roads safe and in good condition? Was the route free of traffic problems?

Rallye-erected Signs

If used, were coursemarkers or other rallye signs visible, readable, and well placed?

Other Signs

Were other signs used by the rallye visible & readable?

Creativity

Was the rallye interesting? Did it work well with its theme? Were there new, innovative ideas?

Execution

Did gimmicks work well? Was there a good balance of easy and difficult gimmicks? Was the rallye well thought out and "polished"?

Scoring & Fairness

Was the scoring fair and accurate? Were the gimmicks weighted correctly? Were protests handled fairly?

Length

Was the rallye about the right length in time? If not, would you prefer ______ shorter or ________ longer

Was the rallye the right length in distance? If not, would you prefer ______ shorter or ________ longer

Critique

Was the critique clear and concise? Were gimmicks explained well?

Scoring

Were scoring and awards presentation efficient?

Thank you for your opinion

Please print any additional comments on the back, such as what you liked most or least about this event.

Discussion

I don't want to "mess up" the draft above, but am thinking we could separate (into separate sections)

* scoring, and awards presentation efficient? (moved close to end)
* material clear and legible?
* registration and CP workers competent?

- Dean

---

I guess we're putting discussion here rather than in the talk page.

Anyway, the rallyemaster doesn't have much control over registration, so we shouldn't count that as part of the "best rallye" awards (although it may still be useful feedback). It would be good to ask about the beginners school too, although we shouldn't expect upper division rallyists to answer that question. And we shouldn't count it when someone other than the rallyemaster gives the class.

I like the idea of putting the questions in rough chronological order (i.e., moving scoring and awards presentation towards the end).

And as we mentioned last night, very few people can offer meaningful feedback on whether protests were handled fairly. Perhaps a better indicator would be how often the protest committee overrules the rallyemaster.

Darin McGrew 10:51, 14 November 2007 (PST)

---

I did many of the tasks that we had been talking about. See what you think.

I also propose that each question get scored by those who answer that question, so partial evaluations are used.

- Dean