Difference between revisions of "TRC Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Cards"

From TRCWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(update with final version)
Line 2: Line 2:
* [http://www.therallyeclub.org/w/index.php?title=TRC_Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Cards&oldid=236 Original Version for Reference]
* [http://www.therallyeclub.org/w/index.php?title=TRC_Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Cards&oldid=236 Original Version for Reference]
* [http://www.therallyeclub.org/w/index.php?title=TRC_Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Cards&oldid=279#Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Card:_Rate_1-10|Updated version using original 1-10 format for Reference]
* [http://www.therallyeclub.org/w/index.php?title=TRC_Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Cards&oldid=279#Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Card:_Rate_1-10|Updated version using original 1-10 format for Reference]
* [[#Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Card|New version using new agree/disagree format]]
* [[#TRC_Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Card|Current version using new agree/disagree format]]
* [[Talk:TRC Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Cards|Discussion about this document]]
* [[Talk:TRC Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Cards|Discussion about this document]]


----
----


== Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Card ==
==TRC Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Card==
Rallye Name  ________________________  Date ___________


Rallye Name_________________________________________ Date: _______________
Class ___________  Circle oneDriver  Navigator  Passenger


(circle one) Driver Navigator  Passenger _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Class: ___________________
Optional: Name ____________________________ Car # ____


Optional: Your name: ______________________________________ Car #: _________
Where did you hear about this rallye? ___________________


Where did you hear about this rallye?  ________________________________________
Please help TRC present better rallyes by responding as follows:
{|
|style="width:3em;text-align:right"| 1 || strongly disagree
|style="width:3em;text-align:right"| 4 || agree
|-
|style="width:3em;text-align:right"| 2 || disagree
|style="width:3em;text-align:right"| 5 || strongly agree
|-
|style="width:3em;text-align:right"| 3 || neither agree nor disagree
|style="width:3em;text-align:right"| N/A || not applicable
|}


Please help TRC present better rallyes by completing the following evaluation. Please respond to each statement as follows:
'''Overall Impressions'''
# strongly disagree
# disagree (or slightly disagree)
# neither agree nor disagree
# agree (or slightly agree)
# strongly agree
(Please respond N/A if the statement is not applicable.)


=== Overall Impressions ===
___ The rallye was fun.
* The rallye was fun.
* There was a good balance of easy and difficult gimmicks.
* The rallye included new, innovative ideas and/or an interesting theme.
* The rallye was well planned and "polished".


=== At the Start ===
___ There was a good balance of easy and difficult gimmicks.
* Registration was efficient.
* Start personnel were available, courteous, and helpful.
* The beginners' introduction (rallye school) helped us. (N/A if did not attend.)


=== Instructions ===
___ There were new, innovative ideas and/or an interesting theme.
* The instructions had no '''unintentional''' errors in spelling, grammar, or meaning.
* The instructions were concise.
* Information was well-formatted, easy to read, and easy to reference.


=== At the Checkpoint(s) ===
___ The rallye was well planned and "polished".
* The checkpoint location(s) were safe and easy to enter.
* The checkpoint process was reasonably fast and efficient.
* Checkpoint workers were polite, competent, and "rallyist friendly".


=== Along the Route ===
'''At the Start'''
* The roads used were safe and free of traffic/parking problems.
* Rallye erected signs (including coursemarkers) were visible, readable, and well placed.
* Other (government/commercial) signs used were visible, readable, and unobstructed.
* The rallye was '''not''' too long in time or distance.
* The rallye was '''not''' too short in time or distance.


=== At the Finish ===
___ Registration was efficient.
* After reading the critique, I understand the gimmicks I missed.
* The scoring of gimmicks was fair and weighted correctly.
* Posting of scores and presentation of awards went promptly.
* Finish personnel were available, courteous, and helpful.


=== Thank you for your opinion ===
___ Start personnel were available, courteous, and helpful.
Please print '''on the back''' any additional comments, such as what you liked most or least about this event, or elaboration on any points.
 
'''Instructions'''
 
___ There were no unintentional errors in spelling, grammar, or meaning.
 
___ The instructions were concise.
 
___ Information was well-formatted, easy to read, and easy to reference.
 
'''At the Checkpoint(s)'''
 
___ The checkpoint location(s) were safe and easy to enter.
 
___ The checkpoint process was reasonably fast and efficient.
 
___ Checkpoint workers were polite, competent, and "rallyist friendly".
 
'''Along the Route'''
 
___ The roads used were safe and free of traffic/parking problems.
 
___ Rallye erected signs (CMs, etc.) were visible, readable, and well placed.
 
___ Other signs used were visible, readable, and unobstructed.
 
___ The rallye was neither too long nor too short (in both time and distance).
 
'''At the Finish'''
 
___ After reading the critique, I understand the gimmicks I missed.
 
___ The scoring of gimmicks was fair and weighted correctly.
 
___ The finish (posting scores, presenting awards, etc.) proceeded promptly.
 
___ Finish personnel were available, courteous, and helpful.
 
Thank you for your opinion.
 
Please print '''on the back''' any additional comments. For example, you could mention what you liked most or least about this event, or elaborate on particular points above.

Revision as of 21:04, 7 January 2008


TRC Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Card

Rallye Name ________________________ Date ___________

Class ___________ Circle one: Driver Navigator Passenger

Optional: Name ____________________________ Car # ____

Where did you hear about this rallye? ___________________

Please help TRC present better rallyes by responding as follows:

1 strongly disagree 4 agree
2 disagree 5 strongly agree
3 neither agree nor disagree N/A not applicable

Overall Impressions

___ The rallye was fun.

___ There was a good balance of easy and difficult gimmicks.

___ There were new, innovative ideas and/or an interesting theme.

___ The rallye was well planned and "polished".

At the Start

___ Registration was efficient.

___ Start personnel were available, courteous, and helpful.

Instructions

___ There were no unintentional errors in spelling, grammar, or meaning.

___ The instructions were concise.

___ Information was well-formatted, easy to read, and easy to reference.

At the Checkpoint(s)

___ The checkpoint location(s) were safe and easy to enter.

___ The checkpoint process was reasonably fast and efficient.

___ Checkpoint workers were polite, competent, and "rallyist friendly".

Along the Route

___ The roads used were safe and free of traffic/parking problems.

___ Rallye erected signs (CMs, etc.) were visible, readable, and well placed.

___ Other signs used were visible, readable, and unobstructed.

___ The rallye was neither too long nor too short (in both time and distance).

At the Finish

___ After reading the critique, I understand the gimmicks I missed.

___ The scoring of gimmicks was fair and weighted correctly.

___ The finish (posting scores, presenting awards, etc.) proceeded promptly.

___ Finish personnel were available, courteous, and helpful.

Thank you for your opinion.

Please print on the back any additional comments. For example, you could mention what you liked most or least about this event, or elaborate on particular points above.