Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
m (copyright question) |
(Copyrights) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
[[User:Darin|Darin McGrew]] 16:31, 31 July 2007 (PDT) | [[User:Darin|Darin McGrew]] 16:31, 31 July 2007 (PDT) | ||
== Copyrights == | |||
Ah, a tricky question. My first gut reaction was one of the [http://www.creativecommons.org/ Creative Commons] licenses (perhaps attributed + no commercial), but I'm leaning towards (gasp!) a more conventional restricted-use copyright. My thinking is that we may want to control the content somewhat more aggressively (perhaps after a recent aggressive email encounter). | |||
On the other hand, having the content under a looser copyright could allow more spread of the concepts and encourage the sport. Perhaps a FreeBSD doc license would accomplish the same. | |||
And we probably ought to be having this discussion in [[Talk:Project:Copyrights]], but it's here, now. | |||
<br>--[[User:Steve|Steve]] 20:44, 31 July 2007 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 21:44, 31 July 2007
Established Conventions:
- Document titles should be in Title Case (cap/lc).
What copyright/license are we using for this wiki's content?
Darin McGrew 16:31, 31 July 2007 (PDT)
Copyrights
Ah, a tricky question. My first gut reaction was one of the Creative Commons licenses (perhaps attributed + no commercial), but I'm leaning towards (gasp!) a more conventional restricted-use copyright. My thinking is that we may want to control the content somewhat more aggressively (perhaps after a recent aggressive email encounter).
On the other hand, having the content under a looser copyright could allow more spread of the concepts and encourage the sport. Perhaps a FreeBSD doc license would accomplish the same.
And we probably ought to be having this discussion in [[Talk:Project:Copyrights]], but it's here, now.
--Steve 20:44, 31 July 2007 (PDT)