Difference between revisions of "TRC Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Cards"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (we decided to go with agree/disagree, so stripping 1-10 format) |
|||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
=== Instructions === | === Instructions === | ||
* The instructions had no '''unintentional''' errors in spelling or | * The instructions had no '''unintentional''' errors in spelling, grammar, or intent. | ||
* The instructions | * The instructions were concise & accurate (not excessive and verbose) | ||
* | * Information was neatly presented/formatted and easy to read and reference | ||
* | * There were minimal last minute changes posted at the start | ||
=== At the Checkpoint(s) === | === At the Checkpoint(s) === |
Revision as of 18:52, 19 December 2007
- Original Version for Reference
- version using original 1-10 format for Reference
- New version using new agree/disagree format
- Discussion about this document
Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Card
Rallye Name: ___________________________________________________
Class: __________ Car #: _________ Date: _________________
(circle one) Driver Navigator Passenger
Optional: Your name: ______________________________
Where did you hear about this rallye? ________________________________________
This gimmick rallye is contending for the annual Best TRC Rallye Award. Please help TRC present better rallyes by filling out the following evaluation card.
Please respond to each statement as follows:
- strongly disagree
- disagree
- neither agree nor disagree
- agree
- strongly agree
(Please respond 0 if the statement is not applicable.)
Overall Impressions
- The rallye was interesting and enjoyable.
- The rallye was challenging.
- The rallye worked well with its theme.
- The rallye included new, innovative ideas.
- There was a good balance of easy and difficult gimmicks.
- The rallye was well planned and "polished".
- The gimmicks worked well.
At the Start
- Registration was efficient.
- I/We attended the Beginner's Introduction (also known as a Rallye School).
- The Beginner's Introduction was a good use of my/our time.
Instructions
- The instructions had no unintentional errors in spelling, grammar, or intent.
- The instructions were concise & accurate (not excessive and verbose)
- Information was neatly presented/formatted and easy to read and reference
- There were minimal last minute changes posted at the start
At the Checkpoint(s)
- The checkpoint materials were clear and legible.
- Checkpoint workers were polite, well instructed, and competent.
Along the Route
- The roads were safe and in good condition.
- The route was free of traffic problems.
- The route had no foreseeable obstacles (e.g., parking problems).
- Rallye erected signs (including coursemarkers) were visible, readable, and well placed.
- Other signs (government/commercial signs) used by the rallye were visible and readable.
- I/We had enough time to finish the rallye without feeling rushed.
- I/We had enough to do without finishing too early.
- The rallye route was too long; we drove too far.
- The rallye route was about the right length.
- The rallye route was too short; we drove too little.
At the Finish
- The critique was clear and concise.
- The gimmicks were explained well in the critique.
- After reading the critique, I understand the gimmicks I missed.
- The maps in the critique were easy to understand.
- The scoring of gimmicks was fair and accurate.
- The gimmicks were weighted correctly.
- Scores were posted in a timely manner.
- The awards were presented in a timely manner.
- After reading the protest committee's comments, I understand their decisions.
Thank you for your opinion
Please print any additional comments on the back, such as what you liked most or least about this event.