Difference between revisions of "TRC Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Cards"

From TRCWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 62: Line 62:
=== At the Finish ===
=== At the Finish ===
* After reading the critique, I understand the gimmicks I missed.
* After reading the critique, I understand the gimmicks I missed.
* The maps in the critique were easy to understand.
* The scoring of gimmicks was fair and weighted correctly
* The scoring of gimmicks was fair and weighted correctly
* Scores were posted in a timely manner.
* The finish proceeded in a timely manner from posting scores to presenting awards
* The awards were presented in a timely manner.
* Protests were handled in a fair and timely manner.
* Protests were handled in a fair and timely manner.


=== Thank you for your opinion ===
=== Thank you for your opinion ===
Please print any additional comments on the back, such as what you liked most or least about this event.
Please print any additional comments on the back, such as what you liked most or least about this event.

Revision as of 18:04, 19 December 2007


Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Card

Rallye Name: ___________________________________________________

Class: __________ Car #: _________ Date: _________________

(circle one) Driver Navigator Passenger

Optional: Your name: ______________________________

Where did you hear about this rallye? ________________________________________

This gimmick rallye is contending for the annual Best TRC Rallye Award. Please help TRC present better rallyes by filling out the following evaluation card.

Please respond to each statement as follows:

  1. strongly disagree
  2. disagree
  3. neither agree nor disagree
  4. agree
  5. strongly agree

(Please respond 0 if the statement is not applicable.)

Overall Impressions

  • The rallye was fun
  • There was a good balance of easy and difficult gimmicks
  • The gimmicks worked well
  • The rallye included new,innovative ideas or an interesting theme
  • The rallye was well planned and "polished"

At the Start

  • Registration was efficient.
  • The Beginner's Introduction was a good use of my/our time.
  • Start personnel were available,courteous, and helpful

Instructions

  • The instructions had no unintentional errors in spelling, grammar, or intent.
  • The instructions were concise & accurate (not excessive and verbose)
  • Information was neatly presented/formatted and easy to read and reference
  • There were minimal last minute changes posted at the start

At the Checkpoint(s)

  • The checkpoint was located in a safe place and easy to enter and exit
  • The checkpoint process was reasonably fast and efficient
  • Checkpoint workers were polite, well instructed, competent, and "rallyist friendly"

Along the Route

  • The roads were wide, in good condition, and provided opportunity to pull over & park.
  • The route was safe and free of traffic problems.
  • Rallye erected signs (including coursemarkers) were visible, readable, and well placed.
  • Other signs (government/commercial signs) used by the rallye were visible, readable, and unobstructed.
  • I/We had enough time to finish the rallye without feeling rushed.
  • I/We had enough to do without finishing too early.

At the Finish

  • After reading the critique, I understand the gimmicks I missed.
  • The scoring of gimmicks was fair and weighted correctly
  • The finish proceeded in a timely manner from posting scores to presenting awards
  • Protests were handled in a fair and timely manner.

Thank you for your opinion

Please print any additional comments on the back, such as what you liked most or least about this event.