TRC Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Cards

From TRCWiki
Revision as of 18:26, 20 December 2007 by Darin (talk | contribs) (stick to "about the right length" and leave the rest for written comments)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Card

Rallye Name: ___________________________________________________

Class: __________ Car #: _________ Date: _________________

(circle one) Driver Navigator Passenger

Optional: Your name: ______________________________

Where did you hear about this rallye? ________________________________________

Please help TRC present better rallyes by completing the following evaluation. Please respond to each statement as follows:

  1. strongly disagree
  2. disagree (or slightly disagree)
  3. neither agree nor disagree
  4. agree (or slightly agree)
  5. strongly agree

(Please respond N/A if the statement is not applicable.)

Overall Impressions

  • The rallye was fun.
  • There was a good balance of easy and difficult gimmicks.
  • The rallye included new, innovative ideas and/or an interesting theme.
  • The rallye was well planned and "polished".

At the Start

  • Registration was efficient.
  • Start personnel were available, courteous, and helpful.

Instructions

  • The instructions had no unintentional errors in spelling, grammar, or meaning.
  • The instructions were concise (not excessive and verbose).
  • Information was well-formatted, easy to read, and easy to reference.

At the Checkpoint(s)

  • The checkpoint location(s) were safe and easy to enter.
  • The checkpoint process was reasonably fast and efficient.
  • Checkpoint workers were polite, competent, and "rallyist friendly".

Along the Route

  • The roads used were safe and free of traffic/parking problems.
  • Rallye erected signs (including coursemarkers) were visible, readable, and well placed.
  • Other signs (government/commercial signs) used by the rallye were visible, readable, and unobstructed.
  • The rallye was about the right length in both time and distance.

At the Finish

  • After reading the critique, I understand the gimmicks I missed.
  • The scoring of gimmicks was fair and weighted correctly.
  • The finish proceeded in a timely manner from posting scores to presenting awards.
  • Finish personnel were available, courteous, and helpful.

Thank you for your opinion

Please print any additional comments on the back, such as what you liked most or least about this event, or, if you want to elaborate any particular point.