Difference between revisions of "TRC Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Cards"

From TRCWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Added Passenger to heading)
m (more comments)
Line 53: Line 53:
Please print additional comments on the back such as what you liked most or least about this event.  Thank you for your opinion.
Please print additional comments on the back such as what you liked most or least about this event.  Thank you for your opinion.


= Discussion =
== Discussion ==


I don't want to "mess up" the draft above, but am thinking we could separate (into separate sections)
I don't want to "mess up" the draft above, but am thinking we could separate (into separate sections)
Line 59: Line 59:
  * material clear and legible?
  * material clear and legible?
  * registration and CP workers competent?
  * registration and CP workers competent?
----
I guess we're putting discussion here rather than in the talk page.
Anyway, the rallyemaster doesn't have much control over registration, so we shouldn't count that as part of the "best rallye" awards (although it may still be useful feedback).
It would be good to ask about the beginners school too, although we shouldn't expect upper division rallyists to answer that question.
And we shouldn't count it when someone other than the rallyemaster gives the class.
I like the idea of putting the questions in rough chronological order (i.e., moving scoring and awards presentation towards the end).
And as we mentioned last night, very few people can offer meaningful feedback on whether protests were handled fairly.
Perhaps a better indicator would be how often the protest committee overrules the rallyemaster.
[[User:Darin|Darin McGrew]] 10:51, 14 November 2007 (PST)

Revision as of 13:51, 14 November 2007

Original Version for Reference

File:TRCLogo.gif


Variety Rallye Evaluation Card

Rallye Name: ___________________________________________________

Class: __________ Car #: _________ Date: _________________

(circle one) Driver Navigator Passenger

This Variety (gimmick) rallye is contending for the annual Best TRC Rallye Award. Please help TRC present better rallyes by filling out the following evaluation card.

Please rate this rallye in each of the below categories on a scale of 0 to 10. 0 is awful, 5 is average, 10 is excellent.

Administration

Were registration, scoring, and awards presentation efficient?

Materials & Personnel

Was the material clear and legible? Were workers polite, well instructed, and competent?

Instructions

Were the instructions clear, concise, and accurate? Was there enough info? Were gimmicks explained well in the critique?

Route

Were the roads safe and in good condition? Was the route free of traffic problems?

Signs

Were the signs visible & readable? If used, were CMs visible, readable, and well placed?

Execution

Did gimmicks work well? Was there a good balance of easy and difficult gimmicks? Was the rallye well thought out and "polished"?

Creativity

Was the rallye interesting? Did it work well with its theme? Were there new, innovative ideas?

Scoring & Fairness

Was the scoring fair and accurate? Were the gimmicks weighted correctly? Were protests handled fairly?

Length

Was the rallye the right length in both time and distance?

Overall Impression

Was the rallye enjoyable and challenging?


Optional: Your name: ______________________________

Where did you hear about this rallye? ________________________________________

Please print additional comments on the back such as what you liked most or least about this event. Thank you for your opinion.

Discussion

I don't want to "mess up" the draft above, but am thinking we could separate (into separate sections)

* scoring, and awards presentation efficient? (moved close to end)
* material clear and legible?
* registration and CP workers competent?

I guess we're putting discussion here rather than in the talk page.

Anyway, the rallyemaster doesn't have much control over registration, so we shouldn't count that as part of the "best rallye" awards (although it may still be useful feedback). It would be good to ask about the beginners school too, although we shouldn't expect upper division rallyists to answer that question. And we shouldn't count it when someone other than the rallyemaster gives the class.

I like the idea of putting the questions in rough chronological order (i.e., moving scoring and awards presentation towards the end).

And as we mentioned last night, very few people can offer meaningful feedback on whether protests were handled fairly. Perhaps a better indicator would be how often the protest committee overrules the rallyemaster.

Darin McGrew 10:51, 14 November 2007 (PST)