Difference between revisions of "TRC Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Cards"

From TRCWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (drop "variety")
m (number sections)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOEDITSECTION__
* [http://www.therallyeclub.org/w/index.php?title=TRC_Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Cards&oldid=236 Original Version for Reference]
* [http://www.therallyeclub.org/w/index.php?title=TRC_Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Cards&oldid=236 Original Version for Reference]
* [[Talk:TRC Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Cards|Discussion about this document]]
* [[Talk:TRC Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Cards|Discussion about this document]]


[[Image:TRCLogo.gif]]
[[Image:TRCLogo.gif]]
__NOTOC__


== Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Card ==
== Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Card ==


Rallye Name:  ___________________________________________________
Rallye Name:  ___________________________________________________
Line 23: Line 22:
Please rate this rallye in each of the below categories on a scale of '''0 to 10'''.  '''0''' is awful, '''5''' is '''average''', '''10''' is excellent.
Please rate this rallye in each of the below categories on a scale of '''0 to 10'''.  '''0''' is awful, '''5''' is '''average''', '''10''' is excellent.


=== Overall Impression ===
=== 1. Overall Impression ===
Was the rallye enjoyable and challenging?
Was the rallye enjoyable and challenging?


=== At the Start ===
=== 2. At the Start ===
Was registration efficient?
Was registration efficient?


If you attended the Beginner's Introduction (also known as a Rallye School), was it a good use of your time?
If you attended the Beginner's Introduction (also known as a Rallye School), was it a good use of your time?


=== Instructions ===
=== 3. Instructions ===
Were the instructions clear, concise, and accurate?  Was there enough info?  Were gimmicks explained well in the critique?
Were the instructions clear, concise, and accurate?  Was there enough info?  Were gimmicks explained well in the critique?


=== Checkpoint Materials & Personnel ===
=== 4. Checkpoint Materials & Personnel ===
Was any checkpoint material clear and legible?  Were workers polite, well instructed, and competent?
Was any checkpoint material clear and legible?  Were workers polite, well instructed, and competent?


=== Route ===
=== 5. Route ===
Were the roads safe and in good condition?  Was the route free of traffic problems?
Were the roads safe and in good condition?  Was the route free of traffic problems?


=== Rallye-erected Signs ===
=== 6. Rallye-erected Signs ===
If used, were coursemarkers or other rallye signs visible, readable, and well placed?
If used, were coursemarkers or other rallye signs visible, readable, and well placed?


=== Other Signs ===
=== 7. Other Signs ===
Were other signs used by the rallye visible & readable?
Were other signs used by the rallye visible & readable?


=== Creativity ===
=== 8. Creativity ===
Was the rallye interesting?  Did it work well with its theme?  Were there new, innovative ideas?
Was the rallye interesting?  Did it work well with its theme?  Were there new, innovative ideas?


=== Execution ===
=== 9. Execution ===
Did gimmicks work well?  Was there a good balance of easy and difficult gimmicks?  Was the rallye well thought out and "polished"?
Did gimmicks work well?  Was there a good balance of easy and difficult gimmicks?  Was the rallye well thought out and "polished"?


=== Scoring & Fairness ===
=== 10. Scoring & Fairness ===
Was the scoring fair and accurate?  Were the gimmicks weighted correctly?  Were protests handled fairly?
Was the scoring fair and accurate?  Were the gimmicks weighted correctly?  Were protests handled fairly?


=== Length ===
=== 11. Length ===
Was the rallye about the right length in time?  If not, would you prefer ______ shorter  or ________ longer
Was the rallye about the right length in time?  If not, would you prefer ______ shorter  or ________ longer


Was the rallye the right length in distance?    If not, would you prefer ______ shorter  or ________ longer
Was the rallye the right length in distance?    If not, would you prefer ______ shorter  or ________ longer


=== Critique ===
=== 12. Critique ===
Was the critique clear and concise?  Were gimmicks explained well?
Was the critique clear and concise?  Were gimmicks explained well?


=== Scoring ===
=== 13. Scoring ===
Were scoring and awards presentation efficient?
Were scoring and awards presentation efficient?


=== Thank you for your opinion ===
== Thank you for your opinion ==
Please print any additional comments on the back, such as what you liked most or least about this event.
Please print any additional comments on the back, such as what you liked most or least about this event.

Revision as of 21:18, 21 November 2007


File:TRCLogo.gif

Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Card

Rallye Name: ___________________________________________________

Class: __________ Car #: _________ Date: _________________

(circle one) Driver Navigator Passenger

Optional: Your name: ______________________________

Where did you hear about this rallye? ________________________________________

This gimmick rallye is contending for the annual Best TRC Rallye Award. Please help TRC present better rallyes by filling out the following evaluation card.

Please rate this rallye in each of the below categories on a scale of 0 to 10. 0 is awful, 5 is average, 10 is excellent.

1. Overall Impression

Was the rallye enjoyable and challenging?

2. At the Start

Was registration efficient?

If you attended the Beginner's Introduction (also known as a Rallye School), was it a good use of your time?

3. Instructions

Were the instructions clear, concise, and accurate? Was there enough info? Were gimmicks explained well in the critique?

4. Checkpoint Materials & Personnel

Was any checkpoint material clear and legible? Were workers polite, well instructed, and competent?

5. Route

Were the roads safe and in good condition? Was the route free of traffic problems?

6. Rallye-erected Signs

If used, were coursemarkers or other rallye signs visible, readable, and well placed?

7. Other Signs

Were other signs used by the rallye visible & readable?

8. Creativity

Was the rallye interesting? Did it work well with its theme? Were there new, innovative ideas?

9. Execution

Did gimmicks work well? Was there a good balance of easy and difficult gimmicks? Was the rallye well thought out and "polished"?

10. Scoring & Fairness

Was the scoring fair and accurate? Were the gimmicks weighted correctly? Were protests handled fairly?

11. Length

Was the rallye about the right length in time? If not, would you prefer ______ shorter or ________ longer

Was the rallye the right length in distance? If not, would you prefer ______ shorter or ________ longer

12. Critique

Was the critique clear and concise? Were gimmicks explained well?

13. Scoring

Were scoring and awards presentation efficient?

Thank you for your opinion

Please print any additional comments on the back, such as what you liked most or least about this event.