Difference between revisions of "TRC Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Cards"

From TRCWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (per Teresa's email (Agree/Disagree Card))
m (we decided to go with agree/disagree, so stripping 1-10 format)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
* [http://www.therallyeclub.org/w/index.php?title=TRC_Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Cards&oldid=236 Original Version for Reference]
* [http://www.therallyeclub.org/w/index.php?title=TRC_Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Cards&oldid=236 Original Version for Reference]
* [[#Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Card:_Rate_1-10|Updated version using original 1-10 format]]
* [http://www.therallyeclub.org/w/index.php?title=TRC_Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Cards&oldid=279#Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Card:_Rate_1-10|Updated version using original 1-10 format for Reference]
* [[#Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Card:_Agree.2FDisagree|New version using new agree/disagree format]]
* [[#Gimmick_Rallye_Evaluation_Card|New version using new agree/disagree format]]
* [[Talk:TRC Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Cards|Discussion about this document]]
* [[Talk:TRC Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Cards|Discussion about this document]]


----
----


== Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Card: Rate 1-10 ==
== Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Card ==
 
Rallye Name:  ___________________________________________________
 
Class: __________ Car #: _________  Date: _________________
 
(circle one) Driver  Navigator  Passenger
 
Optional:  Your name: ______________________________
 
Where did you hear about this rallye?  ________________________________________
 
This gimmick rallye is contending for the annual Best TRC Rallye Award.  Please help TRC present better rallyes by filling out the following evaluation card.
 
Please rate this rallye in each of the below categories on a scale of '''0 to 10'''.  '''0''' is awful, '''5''' is '''average''', '''10''' is excellent.
 
=== 1. Overall Impression ===
Was the rallye enjoyable and challenging?
 
=== 2. At the Start ===
Was registration efficient?
 
If you attended the Beginner's Introduction (also known as a Rallye School), was it a good use of your time?
 
=== 3. Instructions ===
Were the instructions clear, concise, and accurate?  Was there enough info?  Were gimmicks explained well in the critique?
 
=== 4. Checkpoint Materials & Personnel ===
Was any checkpoint material clear and legible?  Were workers polite, well instructed, and competent?
 
=== 5. Route ===
Were the roads safe and in good condition?  Was the route free of traffic problems?
 
=== 6. Rallye-erected Signs ===
If used, were coursemarkers or other rallye signs visible, readable, and well placed?
 
=== 7. Other Signs ===
Were other signs used by the rallye visible & readable?
 
=== 8. Creativity ===
Was the rallye interesting?  Did it work well with its theme?  Were there new, innovative ideas?
 
=== 9. Execution ===
Did gimmicks work well?  Was there a good balance of easy and difficult gimmicks?  Was the rallye well thought out and "polished"?
 
=== 10. Scoring & Fairness ===
Was the scoring fair and accurate?  Were the gimmicks weighted correctly?  Were protests handled fairly?
 
=== 11. Length ===
Was the rallye about the right length in time?  If not, would you prefer ______ shorter  or ________ longer
 
Was the rallye the right length in distance?    If not, would you prefer ______ shorter  or ________ longer
 
=== 12. Critique ===
Was the critique clear and concise?  Were gimmicks explained well?
 
=== 13. Awards ===
Were scoring and awards presentation efficient?
 
=== Thank you for your opinion ===
Please print any additional comments on the back, such as what you liked most or least about this event.
 
----
 
== Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Card: Agree/Disagree ==


Rallye Name:  ___________________________________________________
Rallye Name:  ___________________________________________________

Revision as of 15:57, 19 December 2007


Gimmick Rallye Evaluation Card

Rallye Name: ___________________________________________________

Class: __________ Car #: _________ Date: _________________

(circle one) Driver Navigator Passenger

Optional: Your name: ______________________________

Where did you hear about this rallye? ________________________________________

This gimmick rallye is contending for the annual Best TRC Rallye Award. Please help TRC present better rallyes by filling out the following evaluation card.

Please respond to each statement as follows:

  1. strongly disagree
  2. disagree
  3. neither agree nor disagree
  4. agree
  5. strongly agree

(Please respond 0 if the statement is not applicable.)

Overall Impressions

  • The rallye was interesting and enjoyable.
  • The rallye was challenging.
  • The rallye worked well with its theme.
  • The rallye included new, innovative ideas.
  • There was a good balance of easy and difficult gimmicks.
  • The rallye was well planned and "polished".
  • The gimmicks worked well.

At the Start

  • Registration was efficient.
  • I/We attended the Beginner's Introduction (also known as a Rallye School).
  • The Beginner's Introduction was a good use of my/our time.

Instructions

  • The instructions had no unintentional errors in spelling or grammar.
  • The instructions had no obvious errors (e.g., an R that should have been an L).
  • The instructions were accurate.
  • The instructions provided enough information.

At the Checkpoint(s)

  • The checkpoint materials were clear and legible.
  • Checkpoint workers were polite, well instructed, and competent.

Along the Route

  • The roads were safe and in good condition.
  • The route was free of traffic problems.
  • The route had no foreseeable obstacles (e.g., parking problems).
  • Rallye erected signs (including coursemarkers) were visible, readable, and well placed.
  • Other signs (government/commercial signs) used by the rallye were visible and readable.
  • I/We had enough time to finish the rallye without feeling rushed.
  • I/We had enough to do without finishing too early.
  • The rallye route was too long; we drove too far.
  • The rallye route was about the right length.
  • The rallye route was too short; we drove too little.

At the Finish

  • The critique was clear and concise.
  • The gimmicks were explained well in the critique.
  • After reading the critique, I understand the gimmicks I missed.
  • The maps in the critique were easy to understand.
  • The scoring of gimmicks was fair and accurate.
  • The gimmicks were weighted correctly.
  • Scores were posted in a timely manner.
  • The awards were presented in a timely manner.
  • After reading the protest committee's comments, I understand their decisions.

Thank you for your opinion

Please print any additional comments on the back, such as what you liked most or least about this event.