Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
m (link) |
m (copyright) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
What copyright/license are we using for this wiki's content? | What copyright/license are we using for this wiki's content? | ||
<br>--[[User:Darin|Darin McGrew]] 16:31, 31 July 2007 (PDT) | |||
[[User:Darin|Darin McGrew]] 16:31, 31 July 2007 (PDT) | |||
== Copyrights == | == Copyrights == | ||
| Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
And we probably ought to be having this discussion in [[Talk:Project:Copyrights]], but it's here, now. | And we probably ought to be having this discussion in [[Talk:Project:Copyrights]], but it's here, now. | ||
<br>--[[User:Steve|Steve]] 20:44, 31 July 2007 (PDT) | <br>--[[User:Steve|Steve]] 20:44, 31 July 2007 (PDT) | ||
How about we bring it up at the next business meeting? | |||
<br>--[[User:Darin|Darin McGrew]] 19:27, 1 August 2007 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 21:27, 1 August 2007
Established Conventions:
- Document titles should be in Title Case (cap/lc).
What copyright/license are we using for this wiki's content?
--Darin McGrew 16:31, 31 July 2007 (PDT)
Copyrights
Ah, a tricky question. My first gut reaction was one of the Creative Commons licenses (perhaps attributed + no commercial), but I'm leaning towards (gasp!) a more conventional restricted-use copyright. My thinking is that we may want to control the content somewhat more aggressively (perhaps after a recent aggressive email encounter).
On the other hand, having the content under a looser copyright could allow more spread of the concepts and encourage the sport. Perhaps a FreeBSD doc license would accomplish the same.
And we probably ought to be having this discussion in [[Talk:Project:Copyrights]], but it's here, now.
--Steve 20:44, 31 July 2007 (PDT)
How about we bring it up at the next business meeting?
--Darin McGrew 19:27, 1 August 2007 (PDT)