Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"

From TRCWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (content migration?)
m (business meeting results)
Line 17: Line 17:
I'll add it to the agenda for the next business meeting.
I'll add it to the agenda for the next business meeting.
<br>--[[User:Darin|Darin McGrew]] 16:35, 2 August 2007 (PDT)
<br>--[[User:Darin|Darin McGrew]] 16:35, 2 August 2007 (PDT)
At the business meeting, we decided to use a Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.
So, where do wikis typically put the copyright notice? In [[Project:Copyright]]? I figure the word "copyright" can be linked to that page in the standard template, and that page can include something like this:
<blockquote>Content on this site is copyright by The Rallye Club (TRC)
and is licensed under a
[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License].
</blockquote>
[[User:Darin|Darin McGrew]] 00:41, 22 August 2007 (PDT)


== Migrating Content to the Wiki ==
== Migrating Content to the Wiki ==
Line 30: Line 42:
Any other thoughts?
Any other thoughts?
<br>--[[User:Darin|Darin McGrew]] 16:35, 2 August 2007 (PDT)
<br>--[[User:Darin|Darin McGrew]] 16:35, 2 August 2007 (PDT)
And at the business meeting, we decided to migrate pretty much everything, except for very official documents like the bylaws (which must be preserved in the form they were passed).
[[User:Darin|Darin McGrew]] 00:41, 22 August 2007 (PDT)

Revision as of 02:41, 22 August 2007

Established Conventions

Copyrights

What copyright/license are we using for this wiki's content?
--Darin McGrew 16:31, 31 July 2007 (PDT)

Ah, a tricky question. My first gut reaction was one of the Creative Commons licenses (perhaps attributed + no commercial), but I'm leaning towards (gasp!) a more conventional restricted-use copyright. My thinking is that we may want to control the content somewhat more aggressively (perhaps after a recent aggressive email encounter).

On the other hand, having the content under a looser copyright could allow more spread of the concepts and encourage the sport. Perhaps a FreeBSD doc license would accomplish the same.

And we probably ought to be having this discussion in [[Talk:Project:Copyrights]], but it's here, now.
--Steve 20:44, 31 July 2007 (PDT)

I'll add it to the agenda for the next business meeting.
--Darin McGrew 16:35, 2 August 2007 (PDT)

At the business meeting, we decided to use a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.

So, where do wikis typically put the copyright notice? In Project:Copyright? I figure the word "copyright" can be linked to that page in the standard template, and that page can include something like this:

Content on this site is copyright by The Rallye Club (TRC)

and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.

Darin McGrew 00:41, 22 August 2007 (PDT)

Migrating Content to the Wiki

How much of the content of our main site should we migrate to the wiki?

I can see most of the site migrating. Rallyemasters could update the info about their own rallyes on the calendar and results pages. Others could contribute to the "What's a Rallye?" page. Everyone could contribute to the resources page (and the new Rallyemaster Handbook could be added). And so on.

Any other thoughts?
--Darin McGrew 16:35, 2 August 2007 (PDT)

And at the business meeting, we decided to migrate pretty much everything, except for very official documents like the bylaws (which must be preserved in the form they were passed).

Darin McGrew 00:41, 22 August 2007 (PDT)