Talk:Past TRC Rallyes

Format?

Before I go much further migrating Bill's list of past TRC rallyes to the wiki, I'd like consensus on the best format for this history. What is here now is a fairly simple migration of Bill's table/spreadsheet into a wiki table. However, we could rearrange things. It might make more sense to use reverse chronological order. Or we could list the years in reverse chronological order, but list the rallyes for each year in chronological order.

I omitted the numbers of competitors (both a total count and a breakdown by class). Do we want to publicize these numbers on the wiki? I also omitted the box number. I see no reason to inlude that on the wiki.

Thoughts? Comments? Suggestions?
- Darin McGrew 14:47, 6 November 2008 (PST)

Looks good. No reason to add those other admin stuff columns. I like it in chronological order and will be easier for me to keep it up to date.

Bill

I just added heading rows as separators for the years. Do you think that makes it easier to read?
- Darin McGrew 18:52, 6 November 2008 (PST)

The year break is ok, but what's the green stuff at the top? Now it's gone.

Bill

I've updated the headings and formatting again. I think I like this version.
- Darin McGrew 11:54, 7 November 2008 (PST)

2.5?

Why is there a rallye numbered 2.5? -- Dean 12:35, 7 November 2008 (PST)

There are a few more like that too (46.5, 146.5, 266.5.) They were either short free under an hour events held after a TRC meeting or rallyes which TRC helped but didn't sanction/sponsor like the Braille rallye.

Bill